Agendacc-27March2002.Html

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

Wednesday March 27th, at 9:00-13:00

Draft no. 4, 26th March 2002

Locations: CERN 40-S2-A01 **** Note unusual location at CERN ****

By Videoconference details of reservation at DCS of ESnet, ID: 192414

(LAPP, Ecole Polytechnique, KEK, SLAC)

Excuses: P. Nieminen, H. Kurashige, D. Wright.

1. Regular Items

30 min

Open Action Items

2. Development plans (iteration 2)

1 hour 45 min

Documents for reference:

Requirements and requests of experiments, presented at TSB of 6th February 2002.

Working group objectives: summary, from TSB 6 Feb 2002.

Revised WG objectives: current revision and summary

Summary, discussions (45 minutes)

* of additions, changes, priorities

* of key objectives

- using input from requirements/requests of customers (TSB, 6 Feb 2002)

- Discussion, explanations

Identifying coupling between WG objectives (20 minutes)

* dependencies between objectives

* scheduling considerations

Identifying 'unmet' requests/requirements (20 minutes)

(those that are not included in 2002 WG plans)

* to identify where new resources are required

* to trigger clients to prioritise.

Major developments (15 minutes)

- cuts per region

(status, plans, ..)

2. Support, Documentation

45 min

Support related requests/requirements from experiments

* support for comparisons

* creation of 'reasonable' starting physics lists

Scheduled Release timing for 2002

- development tags

- major and minor releases

- public patches

Policy for public availability

* of product fixes and improvements between scheduled releases

* of plans concerning content of future releases

Detailed documentation assessment plans

Evolution of Hypernews

3. Process

45 min

Software Process Web page

What significant problems did we experience last year in our processes?

- development, releases,

- support, documentation, user/supplier

Which are important enough that we should solve them in 2002 ?

- Requirements collection, management

- Benchmarks

- Statistical/regression tests

What should we try to assess and improve upon this year and in 2003 ?

4. AOB

15 min

Meeting Date